An hour with Lord Christopher Monckton, former science adviser to Margaret Thatcher and a critic of global warming theories.
Categorized | What's Hot
Climate-Gate – Michael Coren with Lord Christopher Monckton – part 1 of 5
Posted on 17 February 2011
25 Responses to “Climate-Gate – Michael Coren with Lord Christopher Monckton – part 1 of 5”
Leave a Reply
Copyright © Indian market research : Bharat Business.
by 
.
@eldrak21
A BIG ‘thankyou’ to you for uploading this ! What a refreshing change to hear TWO intelligent men discussing the reality bechind what is clearly one of the biggest frauds in history – and one which will lead to the untold suffering of millions if not exposed.
Don’t t worry too much about goons like ‘Batteries 76′: they’re the price you pay for using Youtube.
Most haven’t even HEARD of Dick Lindzen (et al) – which undermines THEIR authority somewhat !
Like the look of Coren, too.
@Internetwanker i have no idea what you are talking about. i mean, i understand the words and sentences but have no idea why you are writing them or why you are writing them to me. and i have no idea what you believe. you’re crackers. good luck.
@batteries76
… aaaand batteries … did you UNDERSTAND what I said? You didn’t even READ it.
Or you’re a serious idiot.
@batteries76
blah blah. Evidence for what? For our history? I would say get SOME EDUCATION. Or: Wash your dishes.
Your knowledge ends at your GARDEN GATE. And know … LOLOLOL (to you). HAPPY 2011.
@Internetwanker i don’t see any argument from you. it’s drivel. and worse still you’ve spent time giving yourself thumbs-up. it’s a little sad. i’m no troll – many months ago i posted on here that monckton is a fool, and this has been shown to be true time and again. if you are arguing (and it’s not really clear) that the scientists are all in on some paid conspiracy to back global warming then find some evidence. or at least say something that’s worth arguing against.
@batteries76
oh … it’s your OWN ass … FINE! Sorry but I won’t follow you, lol. Bye!
@batteries76
and what do you want to SAY? Where is the ass you’re crawling in?
ANY ARGUMENT fucking TROLL?
@Internetwanker “enough motifs like always nothing new”. was this post translated out of a foreign language? they are two of the more pointless posts i’ve had the pleasure to read on youtube – and that’s really saying something. but i get the feeling it’s probably a good thing you get all your rants out here rather than standing on a street corner with a placard. nice job giving yourself all those “thumbs-ups” too. disturbing.
@batteries76
let’s just ask who’s interested in such a scandal. Who’s interested in stealing data and has money & time to do this job? Interesting also why they found EXACTLY these data – and I can tell you – it’s like finding the famous needle or counting the stars in the sky. MASSES of data.
Think about the motifs – WHO is initiating this? Who pays for it?
@batteries76
what’s new? Why this hysteria? The industries always bought scientists. ALWAYS.
Why do they make such advertising? Enough motifs like always NOTHING NEW.
Nobody will listen to the environmental protectionists for a while and they can produce whatever they want till the ecomomical crisis is over, LOLOLOLOL!
@bcbobbie my faith in the knowledge base of someone who can’t spell “lindzen” is not great. i’m going to take a wild stab and guess that, as with all deniers who i’ve tangled with who love monckton, you are a free-market and “liberty” maniac who has an ideology that never changes to meet the facts. but seeing as you are pretending to be informed, perhaps you can answer these simple questions: 1. does lindzen say the earth is warming or cooling? 2. does lindzen say humans have caused warming?
@batteries76 And yet he has never lost a debate on this issue including at the famed Oxford Union in which he demonstated obvious knowledge, skill and aptitude (ie expert). What about the renowned Richard Lindsen of MIT he references. Lindsen very calmly dismantles the apthropological global warming agruement and befudled the arrogant Bill Nye on live TV. The only scientists that have been caught fudging data have been the ones pushing the alarmists agenda. 30000>scientists on record oppose AGW.
@partyhouse88 Yes, and the problem concerning how information is packaged and delivered to the consumer is also largely steered by the intelligence network keeping a lid on ’sensitive’ information i.e. sensitive to the cause of globalists. So, its a done deal by the time the public listen to and read ‘the news’; it is news/PR that has already been sanitised before it reaches the desk of hack journalists. So, none of us can be sure how much is info and how much disinfo and how much misinfo.
The only reason they want to control carbon-dioxide is so they [whoever they are] can control the life cycle of every living being on earth; Humans, made up of about 75% carbon, we exhale carbon dioxide. Animals, like humans made of a lot of carbon, exhale carbon dioxide. Plants, pretty sure they’re made of a bunch of carbon too, they inhale carbon dioxide and give off oxygen. Besides carbon dioxide is such a minor greehouse gas that it’s effects on climate are neglegible at best.
The only place where global warming is going on is the planet Venus which has what is called a run-away green house effect. Most of the atmosphere on Venus is Carbon dioxide.
By contrast, most of the Earth’s atmopshere is Nitrogen, then Oxygen, then water vapor. The total amount of carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere is negligibly small.
The primary green house gas on the Earth is water vapor.
Lord? NOT! would you buy a used car from this guy? worse for you!
“Science Advisor to Margret Thatcher” is bit of a stretch. He’s a British politician, journalist, and hereditary peer. He worked for Margret Thatcher’s Number 10 Policy Unit as a political advisor. He was recruited as a domestic specialist with responsibilities for housing and parliamentary affairs, working alongside Mount and Peter Shipley on projects such as the phasing out of council housing. Never once was he a ’science advisor’ and he doesn’t even have a science background.
@Tradd9 partial agree and partial disagree.. many scientists share the profits from the global warming/cooling/climate change situation. grants for studies, programs, research are up for grabs and give scientists a strong incentive to, not lie, but continue the “threat” posed by the supposed looming disaster.
Gore is a poor spokesman not only due to his poor oratory skills but also the hypocrisy by which he lives his life. A good spokesman practices what he preaches.
@thelawguy666 Partially agree. Global warming is not a lie. Climate scientists dont sit round a circular table in an undergound bunker and discuss how they can pull the wool over the eyes of the world. Thats just rediculous. What possible purpose could that serve to the scientists?
Gore refuses to debate because he is not an expert on climate change. He is just a popularizer. He hasnt said anything that scientists havent known for decades. But people dont listent when scientists speak.
@Tradd9 yeah but Gore will not debate anyone, ever, under any circumstances! He does not take anything save for prepared/prescreened questions, and he will not even reply to anyone who questions the underpinning science of his “global warming/cooling/climate change” theory. thats not because he thinks critics are “morons”, rather it is because he is terrified that his very, very, very profitable (now in excess of $500 million) lie will be exposed for the fraud that it (and he) is!
@partyhouse88
No, because its simply not! Carbon trade is just an economic based solution to deal with the CO2 problem. It aim is to give something a price so anyone has a goal to reduce the CO2 polution. And believe, CO2 trade is something big oil does not want. For example, Lord Monckton gets paid by “americans for prosperity”, which is funded by Koch Industries, one of the largest cooperation in the Oil business.
@TengoInfo Enron (oil company) was one of the first to create a carbon trading scheme. Can’t you see that man made global warming theory is just a big scam to transfer wealth and power to a select few individuals and companies??
Lord Monckton is a climate expert? On which university has he studied Climate? The University of Big Oil Paycheck?
Every journalist who says “do your own research” is not a real journalist! Because thats what jounalists are for, to do the research for you and tell you, what they found out!
I dont see anything wrong with refusing a debate with someone you think is a moron. I mean, you wouldnt say ‘yes, id debate bill oriely’, because he is loud and stupid.
@batteries76
You’re a tool…
If you want to cut CO2, stop breathing–the world will be a better place.