The Okhotsk Sea “melting ice” story is a poster bear for the Climate Change Fraud, yet we get almost no coverage of the sailors and ships trapped in the actual ice emergency.
Categorized | What's Hot
Global Warming Okhotsk Sea
Posted on 24 February 2011
25 Responses to “Global Warming Okhotsk Sea”
Leave a Reply
Copyright © Indian market research : Bharat Business.
by 
.
@climategate2009 and it is only a matter of time and the climate change itself will convince you.
you should conenctrate more on the fight against membership in the EU. as a swiss leftist i found that was your only really good point on the blog. the EU is not Democratic and its nonsense, the Euro sucks etc. but the rest…. yes AGW denial. the evidence is there the scientists have a consensus as good as in other fields. its not about belief , its about evidence. so yes it is a denial, sorry
@climategate2009 i have read some of your blog. and no i will not register. Your blog seem to concentrate with wath the media says and not what science publishes. You seem not to understand the science behind AGW, not even the basics like weather is NOT climate. I would not be able to convince you anyway as you would not accept the evidence from science anway and stick to pseudoscientific “scepticism” that actually is denial as much as those in denial of evolution are in denial.
@Aanthanur
This can’t be properly debated here on a video channel. Feel free to stop by eureferendum[,]blogspot[.]com and register in the forum where you can test your ideas. See if they hold up.
@Aanthanur
You don’t seem to realise that they were predicting droughts, barbecue summers and warmer, dryer winters using the same Met programs predicting warming 10 to 100 years in the future.
Now that the opposite has occurred, floods, cools summers, and colder winters with more snow, they claim this too is Global Warming.
It is impossible to falsify AGW as everything proves it is true, even when it is the opposite of what the models predicted.
@Aanthanur
No, the problem here is you amusing too much. I mock the media and read the science. This channel supports efforts that have already caused the IPCC to issue retractions for the AR4.
The problem is the perversion of science. They have developed a massively funded belief system that is full of bias and unfalsifiable. The challenge is good for real science. Going around denouncing people, labelling them and saying “denier” and “liar” is part of the problem, not the solution.
@climategate2009 but that the global temperature is scientific and also that our CO² production is the main cause is also scientific. there is a scientific consensus about it comparable to other theories. and many very respected scientific organizations from around the world have confirmed it to make it clear.
i don’t see how it has turned science into a belief system. the scientific method is still used. the theory no longer a hypothesis, but supported by evidence. no religion has that.
but surely would we also have floods and storms etc would the temp not be rising. And in the media you sometimes can get the impression we would have a perfect climate without AGW, which is obviously nonsense.
But an increase of weather extremes is predicted. because what we know about the global climate system does indeed point to that.
but it also has additional uncertain things like flow of warm water that might change that could have consequences we cannot even properly estimate.
But a higher temperature means more energy in the system and more water vaporization which can lead to more extreme weather. It can lead to a huge imbalance of weather. like here atm very cold winter while at the same time somewhere else it is very warm like Argentina.
also to more water in the air it can lead to more rain/snow and floods and snowstorms.
and here often the media sensationalize things as that sells better. But actually it is likely they are right.
@climategate2009 well i think one problem here is that you mistake media outlets for scientists. Media surely often claim unscientific stuff, well mainly. But not science. and since decades scientists call it often climate change, because that is the more accurate description. But as the main factor we look at is the global average temperature that is rising, global warming also fits.
@Aanthanur
No, I don’t go for conspiracy nonsense at all. Like you, I am a fan of debunking and evidence based science. The core problem with the theory of Global Warming is that they have perverted the scientific process. As everything now equals AGW, be it cooling, warming, floods, droughts, bad weather, lack of bad weather, etc. etc. it is not falsifiable. This eliminates the core perquisite to claiming scientific merit and elevates AGW to a belief system.
@TheSwabbie I ananlysed the “recently recorded temperatures” (see video 4Q1lOr7dbJA) and showed that the warming trend contiues without interruption. I invite anyone to repeat the analysis and show where I erred. They cant because I did not. You assertion that the last decade was not the hottest is based on what? A dream, religious beliefs, make believe? You need evidence, you have none.
@climategate2009 I can prove I am a scientist – google “The Many Faces of the Sun” see who the lead author is of that book. Your turn.
You have been shoveling out 37 videos over 2 years and I have been doing so for 2 months and have put out only 10 – that might explain the difference
I invite anyone to point out an error in my videos and if they find one I will happily change them so far nobody has been able to. Greenman has even copied one of my videos (without credit I note): 4Q1lOr7dbJA
@climategate2009 i am happy to see you don’t buy into those other CT’s
and soon enough we all know for sure AGW is real indeed
@Aanthanur
I’ve deleted your replies to ValarMorgoth’s conspiracy nonsense. The subject of this video is media bias.
@ValarMorgoth
911 “truth” and wacky Illuminati nonsense are not welcome on this channel. You are blocked.
@drkstrong
“99% of the scientific evidence” is a false claim. Real scientists don’t exaggerate and spread propaganda. You can make your argument without resorting to such dishonesty.
You a pretending that there is a higher degree of certainty than even the flawed and discredited IPCC alleges.
@Aanthanur
Read above comment to you. The topic is media bias, not the weather. When the “weather” is warm, it is reported as Global Warming, when it is unusually cold, it is ignored.
@ValarMorgoth
Please stop spreading off topic conspiracy nonsense on my channel. You are not welcome and will be deleted.
@Aanthanur
You miss the whole point. One weather event is not significant. The point is the warmists have used Okhosk Sea ice melting to promote their Global Warming theory. It is a poster boy for the cult. Yet, when we see a very unusual and early, extreme cold even, the warmists and the media ignore it.
If you are going to push warmist propaganda, at least address the issue being discussed.
@BikerVincennes
That is not even the warmists’ claim. They say “warmest year on record” meaning going back to 1880. You should get this right if you want to push warmist propaganda. Also note, it is based upon very controversial and highly adjusted measurements that do not appropriately account for urban heat island effect.
And, 2010 is not statistically significant as “warmest”, at best, equal to the other warm years on record which are more likely due to El Nino, not CO2.
@ValarMorgoth the only thing that got lost here was your patience then you resorted to name-calling
@Aanthanur Don’t worry, I wrote most of these thing so that other people can read it too.
It was nice seeing you lose.
Cheers.
@ValarMorgoth there is no purpose
i just made a bit fun of you.
i am sure in a few years you will also laugh abut the CT’s
have a nice day
@Aanthanur Hmmm, you seam to know quite a lot and still pretending like you need argumentation.
What exactly do you want and what is the purpose of this ?
If the problem is something being short, I can’t help you with that.
@Aanthanur Roflmao ….
So you are an idiot after all …